Can a prescription for a narcotic be given solely to extend a patient's dependence on the medication?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the Nevada Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE). Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

The legality of prescribing narcotics is heavily regulated, particularly given their potential for abuse and dependence. A prescription for a narcotic should always be based on a legitimate medical need for the patient rather than aiming to extend dependence on the medication.

Prescribing narcotics solely to maintain or increase a patient's dependence does not align with the principles of responsible prescribing practices, which prioritize patient safety and the therapeutic goals of treatment. Regulatory agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and state pharmacy boards, have established guidelines to ensure that narcotics are prescribed for appropriate indications, such as managing pain or treating specific conditions, and not for the purpose of prolonging the patient's reliance on the drug.

This aligns with a broader ethical and legal framework that seeks to minimize the risk of addiction and abuse associated with narcotics. As a result, practicing in a manner that extends a patient's dependence without a justifiable medical reason is explicitly prohibited. Thus, the correct conclusion is that it is prohibited to prescribe a narcotic solely to extend a patient's dependence on the medication.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy